Well, this is the review I was reluctant to do . . . but Fili and Kili showed up at Bag End right after Dwalin and Balin, so review them I shall. After all, there are some positive things to say about these guys, so it's not going to be all that bad. Really. I promise.
Let's start this post out with a look at how Tolkien described these two younger dwarves:
It was two more dwarves, both with blue hoods, silver belts, and yellow beards; and each of them carried a bag of tools and a spade.
After reading the author's description, I have to admit that the Rankin and Bass cartoon did a decent job of portraying these guys. They've got the the blue hoods (though I don't see any silver bells) and the yellow beards, and I guess those little pouches they're carrying could be bags of tools . . . though they must be pretty small tools. All in all, I like the way these two dwarves look. Of course, they're nothing like what's coming right after the break . . .
Ba-baam! Fili and Kili!
Sheesh, ba-baam is right. I mean, look at these guys. Kili looks like he's either a runner-up on Hell's Kitchen (just look at those meat-cleavers he's sporting) or a regular stunt double on some B-rated kung-fu film. And then there's Fili. Um . . . Fili kinda defies description. He's short like a dwarf, thin like an elf, and I can only assume that he has some kind of lingering psychological trauma due to all the mocking he endured during grade school because of his wimpy beard. Or maybe not. Maybe those long, flowing tresses were the actual target of bullying. Who knows? To be fair, Fili does have a few things going for him: his eyebrows are wicked-expressive, and he can shoot a bow. So its not all downhill.
If you've read anything about these two, you'll know I'm not alone in my uncomfortable-ness with them. The just don't look that much like dwarves. They're too skinny, too handsome and their beards are way too short. The thing is, there's just not much we can do about it, so the world will just have to trust Mr. Jackson to do right by these two.
Here's the description that came with the photo:
Two of the youngest dwarves, Fili and Kili have been born into the royal line of Durin and raised under the stern guardianship of their uncle, Thorin Oakensheild. Neither has ever travelled far, nor ever seen the fabled Dwarf City of Erebor. For both, the journey to the Lonely Mountain represents adventure and excitement. Skilled fighters, both brothers set off on their adventure armed with the invincible courage of youth, neither being able to imagine the fate which lies before them.
In all honesty, Kili doesn't really bother me all that much. He has a respectable beard, which is always a plus when dealing with dwarves, and he looks just stocky enough to be taken seriously. And, even though I poked some fun at them earlier, those two sword-hatchet hybrids are really cool. They look like serious orc-chopping tools of justice. Another thing I appreciate is that he's a yellow-haired dwarf, just like Mr. Tolkien ordered. I like that attention to detail. Plus, the guy has an infectious smile. He looks like he's just pulled the biggest joke in history on you, and you have no clue. While not quite so dapper looking as Fili, Kili still seems remarkably handsome for a dwarf, but I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that since dwarves live so much longer than men, it might just be possible that young dwarves might look a lot different than old dwarves. Maybe they just age badly. In the end, I think I'd rate movie Kili as a solid 5 out of 10. Not bad, but not that good either.
Now, Fili is a little harder to like. If there were a dwarf line of Barbie dolls, Fili would be Ken. There's no two ways about it. But, since I've already pointed out what I don't like about him (at length), so I'll try and discuss what I do like about him. First and foremost, he's got a bow. I love this. In the book both Fili and Kili use their bows quite a bit, mostly in Mirkwood, if I'm remembering right. But even though the dwarves in The Hobbit are pretty much the archetypes for all fantasy dwarves, somehow the idea got around that they only use axes. So, its refreshing to see a dwarf with a bow. Second . . . nope, never mind. There is no second. As I mentioned in an earlier post, I'm trying to keep an open mind about Fili–Mr. Jackson hasn't gone wrong yet, in my opinion–but at the moment his bow is about the only cool thing about him. I'd give this guy a 3 out of 10.
Last but not least, I'll just mention a bit 'o history:
The dwarves of Durin's line founded Moria during the First Age (read: a really, really, really long time before the events of The Hobbit). It wasn't until the Third Age that the dwarves dug too deep and unearthed the Balrog, which proceeded to kill everyone in site, including the current king of Khazad-dûm, Durin VI, and his son, Nain.
After that, the dwarves abandoned the Black Pit and Nain's son Thrain I founded Erebor, the kingdom under the Lonely Mountain. His son, Thorin I (not the Thorin), moved north to the Grey Mountains. The great-great-great-grandson, Thrór must have gotten cold, because he went back to the Lonely Mountain and reestablished the kingdom there.
Under Thrór the dwarves prospered, and it was not long after that Smaug heard of their riches and decided all that gold would make a nice bed to lay on. The Dragon invaded Erebor, killed most of the dwarves, and Thrór and his family, including his son Thrain II, his grandson Thorin (the Thorin) and granddaughter Dís, barely escaped through a secret door (yes, that secret door) with their lives. And how, you might ask, do Fili and Kili fit into this? I'll let the author himself answer that:
Dís Thraín's daughter was there. She was the mother of Fíli and Kíli, who were born in the Ered Luin.
–The Return of the King; App. A: Durin's Folk; p. 357 (footnote 2)
How did Thraín's family end up in the Ered Luin? Where, for that matter is the Ered Luin? That, my friends, is a story for another time.
Coming soon: Dori, Nori, Ori, Oin and Gloin
I was looking through these, and I have another redeeming quality for Fili. Look just below his ear, and you can see a blue hood. Yep, thats right.
ReplyDeleteYou're totally right! Well . . . I may have to (slightly) adjust my opinion of Mr. Fili. Thanks for pointing that out . . .
DeleteKili is the one with the bow. Fili is the one with the cleavers
ReplyDeleteYeah . . . I figured that out a few months after I wrote this post . . . thanks though!
DeleteLove your site. Must log my opinion about the Dwarves.
ReplyDeleteI'm one year younger than the guy playing Balin (ack!). When I first saw the character designs I went; !?!?!?!?!? I've been writing and illustrating fantasy (and playing D&D, and doing costuming, and playing with broadswords) since 1978. I like Elves. I draw Elves. I reek at doing Dwarves, though my honorary big brother looks precisely like one and is a great model. I saw the character designs for Hobbit and went... "those are Dwarves?... those are Dwarves!!!" Once more, WETA and co. have proven themselves geniuses. I liked LOTR for its detail, and wished the Hobbit had more. The films do have more detail, they must (film is a wholly different medium than a book), and what works well in a fast paced tale meant to be read aloud in the oral tradition (blue hoods, yellow hoods, blue beards and other silliness) simply does not work at all for a modern audience. I like the diversity of the Dwarves; old, young, middle aged, princely, rugged, handsome, funny, gnarly, grim... And yes, I like Kili and Fili. The point is, we have a diverse audience, in a culture used to pretty Hollywood images. Now, we want to show the real Middle Earth, not airbrushed Hollywood, but we also want everyone to be drawn into it. And that means those 17 something fangirls obsessing over boys with pointy teeth, pale skins and no frontal lobes. Lets draw them into some REAL literature! And yeah, you might need an attractive male or two to do that. My other thought, which you have already sort of mentioned, is pedomorphosis.
!?!?!? you say... it means juvenile characteristics,(see also; neoteny). Golden retrievers and wolf puppies look very much alike when they are small. Then the wolves grow up, and the Goldens remain puppy brains with floppy ears and short muzzles and bendable wills. Baby gorillas and baby humans look frighteningly similar. Humans as a species are fairly pedomorphic compared to gorillas and other primates. In Middle Earth, Elves have cornered the market on neoteny, they look young for millenia. Humans age like, well, humans, and Dwarves... since they are long lived, they presumably age slowly (witness Balin's ability to yet kick ass). And presumably, if you put a Dwarf kid and an Elf kid and a Human kid in the same room, they'd look very much alike (except for size). Young Dwarves would, likely, look like young humans.
I'm quite fond of the way WETA has completely blown up the Dwarven stereotypes we have been living with, reinventing the archetype, giving it back more of its old power.
Teanna Byerts... YES to everything you said.
ReplyDeleteI love these Dwarves. These are movie dwarves.
These are now MY dwarves.
The Blond has a silver belt, and the other has that blue outfit underneath
ReplyDeleteLooks like people are more enslaved to the early animated versions than to Tolkien's actual writings. He never provided such detailed descriptions that would not allow the movie to turn these dwarves into some handsome beings. Actually, in his Unfinished Tales and the appendixes, he tells that the Durin line especially was long-lived and such dwarves wouldn't show signs of aging until very late in life (=ugly features, grey or white hair). Also, Thorin himself is depicted as "handsome", so there is no reason to complain about the portrayals in the movie! Those people knew really well what they were doing, and it wasn't just about providing eye candy! No one ever wrote that Dwarves should all be stocky and ugly, no matter their age! Also, how credible and serious would the story be on the silver screen if we actually had colorful Dwarves? Colored beards, colorful clothes vs. a bitter quest for the lost kingdom... that wouldn't be palatable at all!
ReplyDeleteDepends on how you read the Hobbit novel, IMO. The book isn't a "bitter quest for the lost kingdom" at all, it's a fun story about a silly, nervous Hobbit who falls in with some stuffy dwarves and a mysterious wizard who are searching for lost gold. The book is replete with talking purses, giggling elves and singing goblins. So don't tell me the movie wouldn't have been serious enough. It never needed to be too serious in the first place!
DeleteI understand that Kili and Fili seem un-dwarven what with all that fan girl appeal and such. But really, they say Azog the defiler has a horde of them too - diff strokes for diff folks. Besides, I like to think that Dwarves have as much genetic diversity as humans do. I like the irrepressible side they lend to the group and the idea that Dwarves are not born old! I especially mourn the end I know lies ahead for them as well as Thorin and Balin.
ReplyDeleteI gotta agree with you about the fun dimensions Kili and Fili add to the crew . . . I really like their humorous, teasing natures.
DeleteKili is my absolute favorite (the one with the dark hair, not blonde), just cause of the bow. But these two are the best ones. C'mon. You've got to at least give them credit for starting the cutlery song.
ReplyDeleteNo way! The best ones?! Bombur, my friend. Bombur is the best one. But yeah, the fact that they start the cutlery song is pretty cool. I'll grant you that. :)
Delete